萬佛城金剛菩提海 Vajra Bodhi Sea

金剛菩提海:首頁主目錄本期目錄

Vajra Bodhi Sea: HomeMain IndexIssue Index

《菩提田》

 

BODHI FIELD

彿教徒眼中的基因工程(續)
Genetic Engineering: A Buddhist Assessment (continued)

易象乾博士 文 By Ron Epstein, Ph.D.
王青楠博士 中譯 Chinese translation by Qingnan Wang, Ph.D.

另外,野生的自然環境可以提供修禪的良好場所,修行可以迅速進步。自我修行,與自然和諧相處,都要能找一處自然氣場吉祥的地方。以自然為鏡,可以用來看清我們身心過程的深層狀況。在大自然中,他人的個性煩惱不會使我們的煩惱加強。你想像一下,如果我們將自己用基因工程處理之後,就無法再和大自然的本來狀況共鳴了。這類問題,我們是無法來用科學數據來解決的。

生物基因的戰爭,是基因工程對人類最嚴重的短期威脅。出於佛教和平的傳統,佛教徒應非常關注基因工程在戰爭中的使用,這會有效地造成大面積的痛苦與死亡。國際恐怖份子已在認真考慮使用基因工程病毒了,這幾乎是無法管制的,因為商用儀器和技術,很容易就可以轉為軍用。在 1980年代末期,以前的蘇聯,有六萬人從事生物戰工作,包括基因工程病源項目。一個令人驚恐的項目,就是將天花病毒和Ebola病毒結合起來,沒人知道大多數那些科學家到了甚麼地方,帶走了些什麼。

1997年 6月,美國防部長William Cohen警告,「某些病是針對某類特定種族,可能將該種族全清除掉。」有幾個國家都已報導,擁有針對特定種族的基因工程病毒。

雖然媒體大肆吹噓基因工程的益處,主要包括修理缺陷基因、治病、增加食物產量的大量案例,但我認為代價太高了。為使國際公司在下世紀贏得暴利,我們就要賠上生物圈,嚴重損害這個星球上的生命,甚至傷害我們覺悟的潛力。基因工程對人類健康、環境都造成嚴重危脅。為少數人的利益,人是否有權力改變地球上有情、無情眾生的生命,是個重要的倫理問題。

基因工程的特點,在於它的力量與不可逆轉的趨勢。它對人及動植物的傷害能力是量子躍遷,比其他大多數技術大得多,其中的失誤,不會給我們留下改正的餘地。這門技術中的缺陷無法修正,成為以後無數代的負面遺產。

即使基因工程的某些領域,在尊重其他生命的前提下,能夠安全地利益人類,人也應加倍努力探討其科學上風險的程度,實施預防原則,發展倫理準則。因為科學的建立,就是對公眾理念需要的認可,在當前基因工程道德問題上,佛教的倫理也佔有一席之地。同時,大眾能夠要求澈底檢查這個工業與政府及學術界之間的交往,並設定規則,是很重要的一件事。

我們真有影響力嗎?甚至想減緩當前進展速度都極為困難。然而希望還是有的。幸運的是,在這個領域少數經過良好訓練的科學家,看到了其中的危險,勇敢地將良心中的話講了出來。其中的幾位是:有責任感的基因學委員會的Stuart Newman教授、加州柏克萊大學的Richard Strohmann教授、Open University的 Mac-Wan Ho博士、關注科學家聯合會的 Mafgaret Mellon和Jane Rissler博士。

顯然,用實情來教育大眾是個關鍵。我們需要有信心,相信一般大眾能團結一致,建立起一個集體智慧的基礎,為我們指出一條路,走出基因工程這個極其複雜的迷宮。我們能擺脫這個問題嗎?可能不行,但也可能成功。在Vandana Shiva教授領導下的「第三世界網路」,動員了印度和其他發展中國家,抵制跨國公司對基因工程利潤的探求。在歐洲,公眾對基因工程食品危險的高度警覺,最近曾迫使大公司撤回預定的廣泛宣傳。在美國,「有機食物遊說團」和「自然法則之母」,及其他的一些組織,對公眾廣泛宣傳教育了此類基因食品的危險性,因此想要將基因工程食品納入「國家有機食品規則」涵攝範圍的企圖未能得逞。

在佛教徒眼中,基因工程問題與我們每天所面對的其他大多數問題,原則上沒有差別,都是煩惱––貪、瞋、癡等的結果。基因工程問題的獨特處,在於它對這個星球上生命的破壞程度,及對我們和環境不可恢復的結果。佛教徒該怎麼做,回答不一:有人想與許多組織一道努力,提高公眾的覺悟,阻止那些最明顯的危險;有人會直接在心地上用功,以具備度化一切眾生覺悟的智慧與慈悲;還有人,毫無疑問會將頭埋在沙裡,對業果聽天由命。

(全文完)

Furthermore, nature as wilderness provides an effective place for meditation, one where rapid progress can be made. In self-cultivation, harmony with nature involves the ability to find a place for practice where the natural energy is auspicious. Nature acts as a mirror for seeing the deep workings of our own body-minds. When we are alone in the wilderness, the distinctly human afflictions of others are absent, and so cannot reinforce our own afflictions. Imagine what would happen if we genetically engineered ourselves so that we could no longer resonate with the natural patterns of nature. These are not the kinds of concerns that can be laid to rest by any scientific data.

Biogenetic warfare is the most serious short-term threat of genetic engineering to human life. Because Buddhism is a fundamentally pacifist tradition, it should be gravely concerned with the use of genetic engineering in warfare as an efficient means for causing widespread suffering and death. International terror­ists have already begun seriously considering the deployment of genetically engineered viruses. This use is almost impossible to regulate because the same equipment and technology that are used commercially can easily be transferred to military application. During the late 1980s, the former Soviet Union had 60,000 people working on biowarfare, including genetically engineered pathogens. In one of their more frightening projects, they at­tempted to combine the smallpox virus with the Ebola virus. No one knows for sure where most of these scientists have gone or what they have taken with them.

In June, 1997, U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen warned about 'certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could eliminate certain ethnic groups.' Several countries have reportedly already been genetically engineering viruses that target specific ethnic groups.

Despite the benefits of genetic engineering trumpeted in the media—primarily to repair genetic flaws, cure disease, and in­crease food production—in the overwhelming number of cases, I believe the price is too high to pay. To insure mega profits for multinational corporations well into the next century, we will have to mortgage the biosphere, seriously compromise life on the planet, and maybe even harm our potential for enlightenment. Genetic engineering poses serious risks to human health and to the environment. It raises serious ethical questions about the right of human beings to alter life on the planet, both sentient and non-sentient, for the benefit of a few.

What makes genetic engineering special is both its power and its irreversibility. Its ability to harm human, animal, and plant life is a dramatic leap greater than most other technologies and does not leave room for mistakes. Results of flaws in this technology cannot be recalled and fixed, but become the negative heritage to count­less future generations.

If there are some areas of genetic engineering that can safely benefit humanity while respecting other forms of life, then efforts need to be redoubled not only in the area of scientific risk assessment and use of the precautionary principle, but also in developing broad ethical guidelines. Since the scientific establishment is acknowledging the need for public input, there is a window of opportunity for introducing the perspective of Buddhist ethics to current moral questions about proposed research in genetic engineering. It is also important for the public to demand scrutiny and regulation of the industry's revolving-door relations with academia and government.

Can we really have an influence? Even slowing the inexorable progress of the current trends will be extremely difficult. Yet there is hope. Fortunately, a vocal minority of well-trained scientists in the field, such as Prof. Stuart Newman of the Council for Responsible Genetics, Prof. Richard Strohmann of the University of California at Berkeley, Dr. MaeWan Ho of the Open University, Drs. Margaret Mellon and Jane Rissler of the Union of Concerned Scientists, to name just a few, see the dangers of what is occurring and are brave enough to voice their consciences.

Clearly the key is educating the public about what is happening. We need to have confidence that ordinary citizens working together can build a foundation of collective wisdom that can show us the way through the incredibly complicated maze of issues surrounding genetic engineering. Can we make the problems go away? Probably not. But successes are possible: The Third World Network, under the leadership of Prof. Vandana Shiva, has mobilized India and other underdeveloped nations to resist multinational corporations in search of genetic profit. In Europe, heightened public awareness of the dangers of genetically engineered foods has recently forced the major corporate players to back off from plans for their widespread introduction there. Here in the United States, the organic food lobby, the Mothers for Natural Law, and others have orchestrated a public education campaign about the dangers of such food, so that attempts to include genetically engineered food as organic under the National Organic Standards Rule have not succeeded.

From a Buddhist perspective, the problems with genetic engi­neering are no different in principle from most other problems we face in our daily life. They are all the result of afflictions—desire, anger, ignorance, and so forth. What makes the situation with genetic engineering unique is the difference in the degree of damage it can do to life on the planet and the irreversibility of its effect on us and on the environment. There is probably not a single answer to the question of what Buddhists should do about these problems. Some may decide to work actively with the many groups trying to raise public awareness and stop the most blatant dangers. Others may prefer to work directly on the mind ground and try to generate the wisdom and compassion that transforms the minds of all sen­tient beings toward awakening. Yet others will undoubtedly put their heads in the sand and let the karma fall where it may.

(The End)

▲Top

法界佛教總會Dharma Realm Buddhist Association │ © Vajra Bodhi Sea