前期提示:
1.「這個」是「誰」?
2.見是心。
3.非客亦非塵。
|
尚無有止靜
佛陀又進一步,超越了語言文字的領域,
從輪掌中飛一寶光在阿難右邊。又放一光在
阿難左邊。阿難見光,便迴首左右顧盼。佛
陀問他在做什麼。阿難回答說他在看光。佛
陀又問,是他的頭在搖動嗎?阿難答是的,
他的頭在搖動。佛陀為審驗阿難而問道:「
什麼在搖動?什麼是不動的?」阿難的答覆
顯示出他明白我們本具的自性是超越對待的
。他說當自性在眼根顯現的時候,尚且沒有
止靜的相。他怎麼能解釋它到底是靜止的,抑
或是動搖的。佛陀印可了阿難所說是正確無
誤的。
於是佛陀重申他的重點:「你的身體在搖
動,四周的環境也在變化––這都是無常的
。從妄心所生起的妄念,亦如水中遷流不息
的波浪。你為什麼把它當成是真實的?而且
,由於無明,你還繼續不斷的妄用自性。依
你自己的說法,這自性是超越靜止的。但就
因為我們的執著––執著無常短暫的––使
得你不停地轉動。生了又死,死了又生,在
輪迴中輪轉不休。」
佛陀的話收到了效果。與會的大眾親聞目
睹憍陳如與佛陀的對話,也看到了佛陀對阿
難的親身教導。這下他們心安定了,也靜止
下來了。在剎那的寂靜中他們覺察到了失卻
的本心,就彷彿迷失了似的。由於無明,他
們背離了自性。在那一念寂靜中他們經驗到
了一絲亳的醒悟。
見不滅
這一章是《楞嚴經》上「十番顯見」,講自
性如何在我們六根門頭顯現的情形。
這十番是:(一)顯見是心,(二)顯見不
動,(三)顯見不滅,(四)顯見不失,(五
)顯見無還,(六)顯見不雜,(七)顯見無
礙,(八)顯見不分,(九)顯見超情,(十
)顯見離見。為了要證實上述的道理,佛陀選
擇了眼根和見性為討論的主題。
在這第三個觀點中,波斯匿王
與佛陀對老死的問題作了很長的
討論。波斯匿王受到當時印度外
道六師之中兩位的影響。雖然這
兩個外道,迦旃延和毗羅胝子,
提倡不同的修行方法,他們的大
前提是相同的——斷見。波斯匿
王請示佛陀:「彼咸言此身死後
斷滅,名為涅槃。」
這不僅是三千年前印度所獨有
的見解。時至今日,還有人提倡
。根據《大佛頂首楞嚴經正脈疏
》的解釋:「得涅槃者,性恆常
遠離生滅。今反以身死,性即斷
滅為涅槃。真邪說也。」上宣下化
上人更詳盡的解釋說:「他們都說,此身死後
,一切都斷絕滅亡。無因無果,沒有前世,也
沒有來生。他們說人死如燈滅,什麼都沒有了
。斷見主張沒有靈魂,沒有知覺,沒有自性,
什麼都沒有。——他們說這是涅槃。」
事實上,許多對自己教義不太了解的基督徒
,包括天主教徒和新教徒(提倡永生——恰恰
與斷見相反),會不知不覺的發表這種似是而
非的見解。就因為他們不敢肯定人死後到底是
怎麼樣的情形。永生主義者說一切是不變的,
人永遠是人,神永遠是神,馬和牛永遠是馬和
牛;假如你墮地獄,那麼你會永遠在地獄裡頭
,假如你昇天的話,那也是永久的。
|
|
Reminder from last issue:
1. "This" Is "Who?"
2. Seeing in the Mind
3. It's Not Like a Guest and Not Like Dust
|
It's Beyond Even Stillness
Then the Buddha takes it a step farther—beyond the bounds of words and language. He shoots light out from his palm, passing the light first to Ananda's right and then to his left. Ananda, watching the light, turns his head to the left and right. The Buddha asks him what he's doing and Ananda explains that he's looking at the lights. The Buddha asks him if it was his head that moved and Ananda says yes, his head moved. The Buddha checks him by asking: "What moved and what was still?" Ananda's answer indicates that he understands that our inherent nature transcends duality. He says that since his nature, manifesting at the portal of seeing, is even beyond stillness, how could he define it as being still, how much the less moving? The Buddha asserts that Ananda is correct.
With that, the Buddha drives home his point: "Your body moves, your environment moves—they are both subject to constant change. The thoughts created by your false mind also move in a ceaseless pattern like waves on water. Why do you take those things to be real, and, in your ignorance, continue to abuse your nature, which, in your own words, is beyond even stillness? It's just because of that attachment—to what is transitory and ephemeral—that you keep moving. You keep getting born and dying, moving round and round on the wheel of rebirth."
The Buddha's words had an effect. Those who heard and witnessed the dialogue between Kaundinya and the Buddha, and who saw the demonstration made by the Buddha for Ananda, gained a repose. They stopped moving and, in that moment of composure, observed that they had strayed from the true—that they were as if lost. They were separated from their own nature—separated from it by their own ignorance. In that tranquil moment they had a glimmer of awakening.
Seeing is Not Annihilated
This section of the Shurangama Sutra is a ten-part discussion about aspects of our nature which can be detected at the gates of our six sense organs. The list of ten says that the nature (1) is the true mind, (2) does not move, (3) is not annihilated, (4) is not lost, (5) does not return to anything, (6) does not intermingle, (7) is not obstructed, (8) is not separate, (9) transcends the ordinary, and (10) is apart from the function of any one of the sense organs. In order to demonstrate these principles, the Buddha selected the eye and seeing for this discussion.
In this third aspect, King Prasenajit has a lengthy discussion with the Buddha about old age and death. The King has been influenced by two of the leading six teachers of externalist sects who were contemporary in India at the time of the Buddha. Although these two, Kakuda Katyayana and Vairati, advocated different paths of practice, their basic premise was the same—nihilism. The King explains to the Buddha: "Both (of these teachers ) say that this body is annihilated at death and that this is Nirvana."
This view is not only particular to India some three thousand years ago; it is a view still advocated today. According to a commentary on the Shurangama Sutra called the Orthodox Pulse, "Attainment of Nirvana means that our nature is forever apart from birth and death. But these men advocated just the opposite—that at the death of the physical body the
nature is annihilated and just that is Nirvana. Truly a deviant theory!"
Master Hua elaborates: "They say that after this body dies there isn't anything. There is no cause and there is no effect, no future lives and no previous lives. They say that a person's death is just like blowing out a lamp. What was there is gone. Nihilism means there is no soul, no awareness, no nature, nothing at all—that is what they call Nirvana."
In fact, many Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, who are not well-versed in their religion (which advocates eternalism—the opposite of nihilism), will unwittingly express this paradoxical view because they are not really sure what is going to happen after death. The eternalist view says that one never changes. People will always be people, God will always be God, and horses and cows will always be horses and cows. If you fall into the hells you will always be there. If you go to the heavens, it is forever.
|