各位善知識、各位大德、各位善男信女、各位年紀老的及年紀壯、年紀輕的朋友們:
宣化是一個不會說話的人,我所說出的話,是一般人所不願意聽,故不願意講話;尤其不願在人前走、坐;或在人前講話。這是我不敢冒昧的事情。可是既然大家同意我講幾句話,我講得好不好,我不希望大家原諒,可是我希望不願意聽的,把耳朵塞住,不要聽;願意聽的,聽一聽。(大眾笑)
我不是講笑話,這是實實在在對大家所說的。為什麼說大家不願意聽呢?因為我講的話,或者不是人話;甚至螞蟻也不願意聽我說。我願意比作蚊蟲,可是蚊蟲是嗡嗡叫的,說什麼,沒人知道,所以我講話,只可以像隻蚊蟲。
今天的題目,我一看就很不明白,甚麼叫做「啟發內在的智慧」?根本智慧我知道它是無窮無盡的,無量無邊的,叫我說是說不出來,叫我做更做不到,為甚麼呢?因為宣化是一個沒有智慧的人,沒有智慧,而來講智慧,這豈不是莫名其妙?雖然是這樣,也不敢辜負大家的希望、期待,所以勉勉強強的在不知道甚麼是智慧,也學著講一講智慧。我所說出來的,都不是我的智慧;我的智慧,根本就沒有,我只有一個愚癡。可是智慧也是從愚癡而來的,我雖然愚癡,我願意跟大家學著有智慧,也學著怎樣來做人,所以這是我不夠智慧的智慧,不能稱得上是智慧的智慧。不願意聽的請你把耳朵先堵上。(眾笑)
我這個愚癡的人,做事都是不離愚癡兩個字。可是離了愚癡也沒有智慧,離了智慧也沒有愚癡,智慧和愚癡是一而不二,它本來是一個的,可是我們人都願意要智慧,不願意要愚癡。我這個人想要往高處比,比不了,所以一切一切,大家不要的,我都把它撿起來,人家要的我就送給人,所以,這是愚癡人的行為,也是最愚癡的表現。行為是行之於身的,表現於事,所以我覺得愚癡比智慧實用一點。這個智慧,雖然說是好,但是應該讓給旁人,我自己從來沒有智慧,若有智慧,願意布施給所有的人。所以我沒有智慧,因為我有智慧都布施給人。我不管我說得對不對,你願意不願意聽,可是我這個「愚癡」就是這麼「愚癡」,你聽了愚癡人說的愚癡話,也很好聽的,唉!就聽一聽,如果覺得沒有甚麼意思,那麼就不要聽,這是由自己來選擇。這是民主國家,我不能強迫任何人去做他所不願意做的事情。
我想起頭一次和于樞機(于斌)見面的時候,他是天主教,我是佛教,我想度一度他。他是一位天主教樞機,怎樣度呢?我教他信佛教!我說:「于樞機,你做這麼多年的天主教徒,也應該做夠了吧!我教你做一個『天主教的佛教徒』。」說完這話,他瞪著大眼睛來望著我,因為我說的話很奇怪,怎麼教他改變宗教呢?我說:「你不要奇怪,你做天主教的佛教徒,我做一個佛教的天主教徒,咱們兩個人思想一溝通,彼此一交換,世界就沒有戰爭了,你信不信。」他想一想,一拍大腿說:「對,我們就這麼樣幹!」所以,以後他見著佛他拜佛了,不認為拜佛是偶像、是迷信了。
以我這麼一個愚癡的人,想教化于樞機這樣有智慧的一個人,這是人所不敢想像的,然而我對他說明白後,他就很同意了。雖然他往上競選就是教皇了,而他也不怕做不著教皇,對我剛才和他所說的這個思想,他也願意溝通的。為甚麼這麼說呢?因為世界戰爭是由各宗教人士不負責任才有戰爭,宗教人士應該用智慧來做事情,不應該用無明來做事。宗教不應該爭你長我短、你好我壞、你大我小,這麼互爭長短的,無形中就是造成戰爭的開端,造成戰爭的後果了。所以宗教和宗教彼此要是合成一個,打成一片,大家共同向一個目標,教人為善,教人改惡向善,教人改過自新,能向一個目標來走;不相是非,不相毀謗,就是戰爭平息了,為什麼呢?「爭是勝負心,與道相違背,便生四相心,由何得三昧?」你這就一爭,就是愚癡了,你不爭就是智慧。你一爭,就是好事也會壞的,你不爭,壞事也會好的。所以壞事會好了,大家相安無事,也不論你強我勝、你好我不好,不彼此找毛病,這個毛病不是教人家給我找的,是我自己要找自己的毛病。自己去習氣去毛病,去種種自己身上所帶來的無形的刺,把人都扎得受不了,所以爭心先要把它停止,所以說這是爭勝負心,這是爭勝負的一個心,「與道相違背」這個心和道不相應的,你一爭就離道遠了,離道遠了,所以就與道相違背。「便生四相心」在這個時候爭了,我相也生出來,人相也生出來,眾生相,壽者相,接接連連都來了,所以說「便生四相心」,「由何得三昧?」這怎能得真正的正定、正受,你怎麼能得到真正的 Wisdom,真正的波羅蜜智慧?
宗教的本質都是一個的,聖人立教都是「因人施教,應病下藥」,對治人的一切習氣毛病。各有各的不同,雖然不同,可是它的功用都是一個,好像甚麼呢?好像五味,人吃東西要調味,有的人喜歡吃酸的,有的人願意吃甜的,有的人願意吃辣的,有的人願意吃鹹的。吃辣的不能說,我喜歡吃辣的,為甚麼你要吃鹹的?他有他口味;他的口味就是這個。有的人又願意吃苦的,吃甜的人說:「苦的難吃,你為甚麼要吃它?」可是吃苦的人,吃苦,苦深深的到了肚子裡很自在,那個吃辣的到了肚子裡他覺得很舒服,吃甜的亦復如是。所以宗教等於五味一樣,誰願意吃那一味,這是對個人的這種習氣而設的。因此在萬佛聖城裡邊,要把佛教本身的大小乘合而為—,不互相是非的。不但和佛教不彼此生一種爭執,就是其他所有的宗教,都一樣歡迎,也像歡迎佛教這樣子。以前佛教只知道自己是佛教,對其他的宗教都不聞不問,也不加毀謗,可是它們都有距離。我看這樣子對宗教是很不利的,所以我就在萬佛聖城主張,天主教也可以來做彌撒,耶蘇教也可以來做禮拜,猶太教也可以舉行猷太教儀式。到萬佛聖城的人,大家都相安無事,這是愚癡人的行為,但是學也要學習有智慧,慢慢的和大家都合而為一。所以萬佛聖城不但和各宗教的人士合成一體,就是和所有的眾生,飛、潛、動、植等,都合而為一,皆一視同仁,都是大家和平共處,有同樣的宗旨。所以萬佛聖城裡,什麼眾生都有,人當然沒有例外,其他什麼的眾生,牠來了,我都歡迎。現在,於萬佛聖城中,我們都埋頭苦幹,默默耕耘。目前,各國的人土都有,不分種族,也不分國籍,也不分人、我;這一些問題都把它取消了。不過,萬佛聖城雖然已經成立十多年了,仍然有很多人不知道。
我相信我自己這個愚癡的人,仍然可以學所有宗教的智慧,所以我先從小螞蟻、小蚊蟲開始,這是對大家講的真話、實話。所謂:「真語、實語、不妄語、不異語。」佛說的這一些話,也是我們人人都能明白的。為什麼佛這樣說呢?佛言:「一切眾生皆有佛性,皆堪作佛。」他沒有說,我這個眾生可以成佛,你那個眾生不能成佛,沒有這個。「一切眾生皆有佛性,皆堪作佛。」由此,可證明大家都是同路而來,還要同路而歸。所以不和任何人分彼此,這是我這個愚癡人的想法,雖然我知道有很多人不願意聽這話,我仍然要說出來。他們認為沒有什麼意思,但是我還要說。有沒有人睡覺?(眾笑)
(法師翻譯並用英語問,是不是你們都不願意聽?回答是:不)
上人:我再借用幾分鐘,因為我真正的意思還沒有說完呢!我們想要學有智慧,先要認識愚癡;你要認識了甚麼叫愚癡?也就是認識這個智慧了。這種智慧不從外來,是從你的自性上來的,你的自性是什麼?就是佛性,你的自性就是你的本來面目,你的自性是誰也替不著你的。這個我簡單的說,因為沒有時間,只有五分鐘。
你不著到色上,你知道色,是對修行有障礙,你要能斷了色塵,這就是智慧。
聲塵,你願意聽聲音,這也是愚癡,你要是把聲塵看作是「有若無,實若虛,有而不有,無而不無」能像這樣走馬觀花似的,不著住到這個聲塵上,這也就是真正智慧了。你有真正的智慧才不執著這些色、聲、香、味、觸、法,你能把它完全都看得穿放得下了,再把財、色、名、食、睡也能看穿了,認識了,不為財慾所搖動,不為色慾所搖動,不為食慾所搖動,不為睡慾所搖動,也不為名譽的慾所搖動,能不為這個六塵和五慾所迷惑,這就是有真正智慧的人,這就是真正想要成佛的人,所以要加上不爭、不貪、不求、不自私、不自利、不打妄語。我們人為什麼要打妄語?就因為自私,為什麼要自私?就因為有自利,因為想要自利,所以貪心就生出了。你有了貪心,那麼爭心也跟著跑出來。所以不爭、不貪、不求、不自私、不自利、不打妄語,這就是成佛的一條光明大道。你選一條,每一天都要在這六條路上走,你要時時刻刻都能按照不爭、不貪、不求、不自私、不自利、不打妄語,這六條光明的道路向前邁進,這一定證大佛果,一定成佛有餘的。我是一個愚癡的人,旁人都說自己有智慧,我知自己絲毫的智慧也沒有,不過大家既然叫我講,我就把我愚癡的見解告訴大家,大家願意聽,我也這麼講,不願意聽,也這麼講。你們也不要謝謝我,我也不要謝謝你們。接著來是問題的節目。我老實告訴你們,你們都比我有智慧,誰有什麼問題,要是覺得令我很為難的,我沒有這個程度來答覆你們的問題,你們就另外找有智慧的人去問好了,我是一個不學無術的人,所以希望大家明白我的立場,我是很愚癡的答覆你們的問題,或者都不會滿意,雖然說不會滿意,可是我也勉為其難。
|
|
All Good & Wise Advisors, Venerable Swamis, all good men and women, especially the elders present, and especially those in the prime of life, especially all young friends, good morning!
I, Hsuan Hua, am a very inarticulate person. Talking does not come easy to me. I am especially unwilling to walk or sit in front of anyone else, or to come and speak before anyone else. I don't assume to put myself in those places, I don't dare to make that assumption. But you are all so sincere and have invited me to say a few words. This being the case, I don't hope that you will forgive me, but I will say that those of you who don't want to hear what I have to say, please shut your ears. Those who are willing to hear what I have to say, feel free to listen on. (Laughter.)
Now what I said is not a joke, it's absolutely the bald truth. This is a genuine expression of my heart, so why, if this is the case, might some of you be unwilling to listen? Why might some of you not want to hear what I have to say? Well, perhaps it's because the things I have to say are not ordinary human talk, or normal human discourse. I assume it's the case that the ants wouldn't want to say the things that I have to say. People who know me, know that I often refer to myself as being like a mosquito, but the problem with being like a mosquito is they can only buzz, so nobody understands what mosquitoes say. So I don't want to compare the things I say to a mosquito talk. But all the same, I will say there is a place where we are the same, which is the things I have to say to you are like a mosquito in that I always want to take blood from those who hear me buzz, the way a mosquito does.
The topic today, as soon as I saw it on the program, I thought, "Gee, I don't understand that! The topic is called activating inner wisdom. Well, wisdom, as far as I know, is limitless and boundless, which is to say there is no way one can completely express it in words." So, here I am in a situation being unable to express the topic - - you can't say it! You people want me to talk about it and I can't talk about it. If you want an example of how to put it into practice, I can do that even less. I myself have no wisdom. So, if you ask me to come before you all and talk about wisdom, then it's really a quandary. All the same I don't want to disappoint your expectations, since all of you have been so sincere in requesting. So I thought that I will force it, (Translator: In Chinese this phrase is eloquent, and in English it takes about three sentences to say.) I'll try to explain to you in a way that learns as I speak.
What I say to you is not my wisdom, I am not the source of my own wisdom. In fact, I have no wisdom to speak of. What I do have, is a stupidity. This is not so strange because you could say wisdom emanates from stupidity. But I want to learn the wisdom that I hope to attain from all of you. Especially, in the matters of how to become a good person. So, I can't say that what I offer is the wisdom of wisdom, it is simply the wisdom of stupidity.
Now the stupidity that I am talking about does not depart from wisdom. In fact, stupidity is the source of wisdom. If you don't have stupidity, there will be no wisdom. And yet, if you are looking for wisdom you will not find it apart from stupidity. Wisdom and stupidity (Translator: stupidity can also be translated as ignorance) are two things that are non-dual; they are one and the same. All the same, we people much prefer wisdom, we always aspire upwards towards wisdom. Nobody would openly admit that they prefer stupidity or ignorance. I myself, in ignorance, I am this way I don't dare compare myself to wisdom that ascends. This is the way I see it, whatever other people don't want, that's what I go and pick up for myself. And anything that others want, I will give to them.
This is my stupid behavior, and it's also my dumb
appearance; the way I show myself externally. Now, behavior,
that's something that you yourself are aware of, that's in
the person. The outer manifestation is what others perceive,
that's what the world witnesses. So, all in all, I would say
that stupidity is much more practical than wisdom. It's much
more applicable to life.
Wisdom, although it receives the praise of the world, is not something one needs to aspire to. This should be something that one is willing to give to others. So my principle is that I want to give as much wisdom as I can, and not keep it for myself. If I had any, I wouldn't be in the process of giving it to others. So, I don't know whether you want to listen to this, but that's just how ignorant my wisdom is. You have freedom of choice. If you listen to this stupid person talking about stupidity and say, "Hey! that's pretty good, that's interesting!" then I invite you to listen. If you listen to it and the more you hear the less you like it, well it's up to you, you're free to choose. This is a democracy, and I cannot compel any of you to do what you are not willing to do.
I recall the first time I met the late Paul, Cardinal Yu-bin, who was the Catholic Cardinal of China. I am a Buddhist, I was interested in taking him across and making him a Buddhist as well. I thought, well, how am I going to do this? So, the first time I met the Cardinal I said, "Cardinal Yu-bin, you have been a Catholic for so long, I bet you're tired of it." So he stared at me. I said, "I have a proposal, why don't you be a Catholic-Buddhist? Why don't you be the Buddhist among the Catholics?"
He opened his eyes even wider at that, and he stared. He thought that was pretty strange. Why would I be asking him to change his religion? How incredible! So I said "Cardinal Yu-bin, you need not see this as strange, You should go ahead and be the Buddhist among the Catholics. Then I will be the Catholic among the Buddhists. That way, when our thinking merges, we can exchange our beliefs in this way, and it will put an end to all the wars in the world. So what do you say?' He stared at me a little longer, about two minutes,and he slapped his thigh and said "Right! Let's do it!"
After that, since he's a man of his word, he went into the Buddha Hall at the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas and bowed to the Buddha images. After that he didn't think bowing was such a superstitious act, or like worshiping graven idols. He didn't think that way any longer.
So, that you could say, was my dumb intent, to try and take across a Catholic Cardinal. Especially a person as wise as Cardinal Yu-bin. I believe nobody dared do such a thing in the past. When I explained the principle behind it, not only did he not stand behind his seat as a Cardinal, he completely agreed with the principle and the truths inside. He didn't fear over-stepping the boundaries of his Cardinal's authority. In fact, he stepped out of that role in order to meet the truth of unity and harmony among religions. His intent was to connect at the level of thought; to put the hearts together.
Now, as we look at the wars in the world we can know that a large part of the responsibility for them should be placed squarely on the shoulders of religious leaders who are not upholding their proper duty, their proper responsibility, in guiding people away from warfare. We need to use wisdom to do the things we do; we don't want to use ignorance and stupidity to do those things.
What does that mean? Well, stupidity would mean constantly finding fault, constantly criticizing; finding out where my religion is long, and your religion is short, mine is good and yours is bad. In this way, we are constantly knit-picking and harping on each other. When we allow ourselves to fall into this habit, then invisibly the seeds of warfare have been planted. The conflict that follows is simply the natural progression of those seeds.
If religious people can unite, we can then go forward together and teach people how to change their faults, how to go towards the good, how to end ignorant behavior, and how to bring into being all wise behavior. Since we have the same goal, we should instruct those who follow our religions not to gossip, not talk about what is right and what is wrong among religions. Most of all they should be taught to avoid slander, mutual vilification. When we can be this way then wars will naturally end because the seeds that foment them will not be in the ground.
There is a verse that says
Fighting is the attitude of victory and defeat;
It stands in opposition the the Way, (the Tao)
Further it brings into being the Four Mark mind,
ow can you possibly attain samadhi?
That's to say once we begin fighting for any reason then we have let our stupidity loose. Once we refuse to fight then we have allowed our wisdom to flourish. If we refuse to fight, then a bad situation can turn good. Likewise, if we are in a good situation and decide to fight, it will become a bad situation. So peace depends on what we do. Nobody in this world tells us to contend, or to mutually find faults. In fact, the problem of correcting faults is something that we, as religious believers, should make our first order of business. We should rid our character of faults; find the invisible thorns in our nature, and change the parts of our personality that prick others when they draw near us. Those are the thorns in our nature.
We should thoroughly banish a mind of contention, because once we have this thought, then there is a winner and a looser, which allows disharmony and discord. Once we fight, then we are far away from the Path, the Tao, we cannot approach it anymore. When we fight we create the Four Mark mind, the mind of four characteristics. Those four characteristics are self, others, living beings, and creatures with lifespans. All of those are perceived one by one, they all roll right out when we allow a thought of contention to arise in our minds.
|
Venerable Master Speaking Dharma for the Vedanta Assembly 上人說法 |
Once we have a thought of self and others, that are separated from me, and living creatures with life span, then comes forth the Four Mark mind, and then how will we approach samadhi? How will we attain a state of meditative peace where we have proper concentration, and proper reception? How will there be any wisdom? How can we approach Prajna wisdom once we allow a thought of contention to arise in our minds?
The basic substance of all the different religions is one and the same. It is said that
"religions all emanate from people's needs, the way medicines all appear for illnesses."
If we want to cure the illnesses in people we should use a different medicine, because the illnesses are not all the same. This is true, nonetheless the function of medicine is simply one, to cure illness; and so it is with religion. Everyone is different. I will give as an analogy, the five flavors of food.
Many people know that Chinese cuisine is divided into five flavors, which are the spices on our food. Religions are this way, too, like the seasoning in people, as it were. Which is to say some people prefer sour, other people prefer sweet, others prefer hot/spicy food, others like salty, still there are others who like bland or bitter food. Now, if one person prefers sweet, hot, bitter or sour, you can't correct him and say he's wrong. Someone may argue, and say "Hot, spicy food is the best, how can you like salty food? You're wrong!" You can't righteously say that, because verybody has a different palate, a flavor they prefer. It's simply a matter of taste.
Religions are the same way. The people who like sweet flavors have no basis in criticizing those who like bitter flavors. Simply because when the person who likes it bitter swallows his food, he feels comfortable with that flavor. The person who likes the sweet flavor, feels hers is the best, and enjoys the feeling when she swallows it. There's no basis for criticism. Religions are the same way, whoever prefers, according to their taste, has a right to believe and to follow as he pleases. It's a question of habits.
Now, at the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas, following the same analogy, we have established our monastery to accord. The first thing we did was to heal the artificial division between the so-called Mahayana and Theravada (The Great Vehicle and The Small Vehicle), we put them together so that the two Vehicles no longer mutually engage in criticism or set up an adversarial relationship. This never existed at the City of Teri Thousand Buddhas. The many Vehicles are one at that Buddhist community. We welcome all religions there. In the past, I know it was the case, that Buddhists stayed in their Buddhist circles that was all that they knew. There was little contact with other religious groups; and this is not the way it should be. While there was no open hostility, there was still a division, you knew where you belonged and you didn't join other groups. I always felt that this attitude was disadvantageous to world peace.
So the policy at the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas has been that we welcome Catholics to perform the mass in our Buddha hall, and in fact, this has occurred on a regular basis. We also welcome Protestants to give their services in our worship halls. We also welcome Jewish Rabbis to chant their Holy ceremonies in their worship halls; we don't want to say
ours because they are theirs equally. We want the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas to be the home of all religious people. It won't be any different than if the Buddhists were there, it is the same. So, at the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas we want to create harmony among all peoples. That is how this stupid person has set up his monastery.
I call myself a stupid person because my wish is to learn the ways of wisdom. I can't say that I have any wisdom of my own, but I am, all the same, willing to unify with all of you, and become one. Not only am I willing to do this with all religious people, but, at the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas our credo, our principle, is that we want to unite with all living beings completely; that is to say we want the view all the world as a single family and live in harmony, the way a family should.
This is our principle: We treat all living beings alike. It should be this way among all people and how much the more so should it be with all living beings. So, I welcome all of you to the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas. At our City, in Talmage, near Ukiah, we keep a very low profile, we do our daily rounds in silence, we don't advertise, or blow our own horn. As a result, even our next-door neighbors, know little about us. But, our central goal is to lose the discriminations that set people and religions apart.
I don't know whether you believe the things I've said. I acknowledged at the start they my comments were coming from a stupid person. Some of you may have taken my advice and stopped listening, but if you plugged your ears then you did not hear what I said. My goal, nonetheless, is to learn the wisdom of all religions and to learn the wisdom of all living beings. Where do I start? I start with ants and with mosquitoes. Now, some of you may laugh, but it's true, it's straight talk.
There will be people here who do understand what I say. The Buddha's first teaching was that all living beings have the Buddha nature, and that all can become Buddhas. This is not to say that there are certain living beings who cannot become Buddhas. That is not the case; all living beings have the Buddha nature, and all can become Buddhas.
We all come here by the same road, and will return on the same road. Since we are all travellers on this road, there is no need to differentiate between ourselves and other living beings. Although we aspire to live this way, and walk this way, I know there are people who would prefer not to hear what I have said. They don't want to listen. Is that the case with all of you? Is anybody sleeping? We're going to request another three minutes because I haven't gotten to the real point of what I want to say! (Laughter.)
So, if we want to have real wisdom, the first job is to learn to recognize stupidity. What is stupidity, after all? If we really see it clearly, then we will know what wisdom is. Wisdom is not something that arrives from outside. Recognition of it is not done from outside. We recognize wisdom from our own self nature, this is the Buddha nature; this is our original face, our fundamental identity. Nobody can take it from us, or stand in for us and use it in our place. I only have five minutes so I will tell you in brief. If you don't attach to forms, that is to say, (Translator: the literal Chinese is the "dust of visual sense objects", it's called the " dust of things seen"); if we attach to objects with form, things that we see, then we should know that this attachment to beautiful forms will impede our cultivation, this will create an impediment to our spiritual cultivation. If we can cut off this attachment to beautiful sights, just this is wisdom. It's the same way with the dust of sounds, with the things we hear. If we attach to those sounds, then our cultivation will turn towards stupidity and turn away from wisdom. Cultivators should look at sights and listen to sounds as if they were not there; we should treat them as if they were illusory. We can regard them like a person who "rides by on a horse to look at the flowers" (Literal translation), like a tourist. If that's the way we see the sights and hear the sounds of the real world then there can be real wisdom. If we can see through and put down sights, sounds, smells, flavors, and sensations of touch, those five things, then we can approach wisdom.
Furthermore, we should recognize the pursuit of wealth, sex, fame, food and sleep as as being part of stupidity Once we have seen through and put down the senses, then we must further identify these Five Desires. If we can be unmoved by the pursuit of wealth, see through the desire for property and money; if we can stop the relentless pursuit of sexual pleasure, as well as the desire for food, the craving for more and newer sensations of flavor, and if we can abandon the pursuit of sleep or comfort, if we can see through fame, and not be moved by any of these desires, then we are on the road to wisdom.
The Six Objects of the Senses: sights, sounds, smells, taste, objects of touch, and dharmas (the sense objects of the mind) are things we desire. Furthermore, the Five Desires are wealth, sex, fame, food, and sleep. If we can see these things as ordinary, if they don't hook us, seduce us, or tempt us, and we are not attached to them, then we can have real wisdom. If we can bring forth this wisdom then we are on the road to Buddha hood.
Further, there are six more important things to mention: the Six Guiding Principles of the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas. The first of these is not fighting, not fighting in our thoughts. The second is not being greedy; the third is not seeking anything; the fourth is not being selfish; the fifth is not pursuing self-benefit; the sixth is not lying. These problems all arise from selfishness, so we begin to investigate them there. When we cant be unselfish, then we are no longer greedy. But if we are selfish, and hang on to that thought of self, then greed will come forth. What follows is contention and fighting.
So we begin with the question of selfishness. Further, cultivators don't seek anything, and are content at all times. Then, we want to not tell lies, but to be honest and have integrity. If we can keep these six principles in front of us at all times, then we are at all times on the broad, bright road to the wisdom of Buddhahood.
I think everyone understands these Six Guidelines, and we know that they are right, but how many of us walk this road? How many of us set our feet on this road in the morning and never leave it during the day? Well, if we can, then we are at all times on the road to Buddha hood. Well, if we can, then we are on the bright road of wisdom. Even though we may not want to arrive, we will quickly reach the end of the road, the fruition of Great Wisdom.
When I was introduced to Swami Prabuddhananda, he said you all hoped to learn wisdom from me. I said, "Sorry, I am a stupid person. All I can do is bring forth my ignorant point of view." If there are those people who like to hear what I have to say, then I just spoke my piece. The people who don't like to hear it, also heard me have my say, anyway. So, this being the case, I hope you won't thank me, and I won't thank you, and we'll wind up right where we started.
Now is the time for questions, and I will tell you frankly, before we begin, that I think all of you have much more wisdom than I have. If you want to stick me with tough questions about wisdom, then I hope after you hear my answers you will feel free to seek a higher authority. I am inept, I am just an amateur here. I'm afraid many of you will feel unsatisfied by the answers that I give. If that's the case, you've been warned, and I won't say I'm sorry.
|