Excerpts from THE
EXISTENCE AND
HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE
Pai-Chang-Ching-Kuei
By
Professor R. S. Lee
Pai-Chang-Ch'ing-Kuei
is also called Ku-Ch'ing-Kuei( ), which means the ancient monastic system,
(cf. the contents of the Preface of the Ku-Ch'ing-Kuei). The manuscript of
the Pai-Chang-Ch'ing-Kuei or the Ku-Ch'ing-Kuei was completely lost after
the fall of the Southern Sung Dynasty. Ch'an Master Yuan-hsi( ), the monastic
successor of Huai-hai at the Pai-Chang mountain, had once intended to
revise this Ch'ing-Kuei, but according to his letter to Monk I-shan( )
which
was collected in the Buddhist Tripitaka, he did not succeed in his
intention. The original manuscript unfortunately disappeared with Yuan-hsi's
death. The only reliable material pertaining to the Ku-Ch'ing-Kuei in the
present time is the Preface of Ku-Ch'ing-Kuei by Yang-i( ), an official
historian of the Sung Dynasty. (Buddhist Tripitaka, Vol. 48).
Yang-i's
preface of Pai-Chang-Ch'ing-Kuei was completed in 1004( )
during the reign of
Emperor Chen-tsung ( ). This preface, according to his own indication, was a
work, which followed the emperor's order. The preface summarized the
original ideas of Master Huai-hai and the basic structure of the
Pai-Chang-Ch'ing-Kuei.
In
the preface Yang-i says: "Ch'an Master Ta-chi( ), the Dharma name of
Huai-hai) of the Pai-Chang mountain has thought that Ch'an Buddhism
developed from Shao-shih ( ) (Bodhidharma) until Ts'ao-hsi
( , Hui-neng ). Most of
the Ch'an monks stayed in Lu-ssu ( temples of the School of Vinaya).
Although the monasteries let them stay in separate living quarters, it was
not very convenient for their own kind of teaching and practice. He often
pondered this problem and said: 'One must try to preach the path of the
original Buddha and not let it be disregarded in the future. Why should we
merely follow the collection of the agamas? Some say that the
Yogacaryabhumi-sastra( ) and the Ying-lo-ching
( the Necklace Sutra) deal with
Mahayana-vinaya. Why should we not follow them?"
"Master
Huai-hai also said, “My intention is not to try and separate Mahayana
and Hinayana or to distinguish Mahayana and Hinayana, but I hope to find a
permanent system which could be very convenient and useful."
(Buddhist Tripitaka, Vol. 48, pp. 1157-1158).
This
passage obviously is an early historic account. The passage shows three
significant points. The first, that most Ch'an monks until Master Huai-hai
had lived in the Southern Buddhist style, a living situation which was
inappropriate to Chinese society. This situation posed the second point,
as to the possibilities for Buddhism in China. 'The third' is Master
Huai-hai's intention to establish a Ch'an monastery. These three
significant points provided the change.
To
be continued. |